The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Apply identification principles to goods
|
|
Product research is undertaken Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research resources to classify goods are accessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objective and analytical classification principles are applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) decisions and court cases are considered Completed |
Evidence:
|
Precedents are considered Completed |
Evidence:
|
Validation of identification is sought as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpret and apply interpretative rules to goods
|
|
Appropriate interpretative rules are identified and accessed when classifying goods Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpretive rules are applied to justify tariff classification of goods Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interpret and apply section and chapter notes to goods
|
|
Tariff classification is considered in relation to legal notes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Rejection of alternate headings is justified by reference to section and chapter notes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select tariff headings
|
|
Terms in context of particular tariff headings and words are applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
References to aid interpretation of tariff are used as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternate headings are considered as appropriate Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select tariff sub-headings
|
|
AAT decisions, court cases and other precedents on tariff classification are interpreted and used to inform selection Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sub-heading notes are reviewed in hierarchical order Completed |
Evidence:
|
Dash system is applied to classification Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant precedents are applied when classifying goods Completed |
Evidence:
|
Complete post classification requirements
|
|
Requirements for tariff classification advice are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tariff Classification Advice Request is prepared in response to identified problems Completed |
Evidence:
|
Applications for Tariff Concession Order are made in response to client instructions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant documentation and other sources of information such as that sourced from the internet or from industry experts, is retained in accordance with legislative requirements and workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Completed documentation is stored in accordance with Australian Customs and Border Protection and related legislative requirements, and workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Tariff classification advice is provided to client in accordance with workplace procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre-or post classification areas of dispute are identified and dispute resolution procedures are initiated as appropriate Completed |
Evidence:
|